CEO by Demand: OpenAI Staff’s Collective Efforts in Bringing Back Sam Altman 

CEO by Demand: OpenAI Staff's Collective Efforts in Bringing Back Sam Altman 

Table of Contents

  • Ayah
  • December 20, 2023

Even artificial intelligence would’ve had a tough time coming up with a story as crazy as what happened at OpenAI recently. Five days of bosses shuffling around, people getting hired and fired, and even an attempt by the staff to take charge. But guess what? We’re back to square one, with Altman back in charge.

But how did this all happen, and why?

It’s like being caught up in the plot of an intense TV drama, and things are unfolding at such breakneck speed that it’s almost too difficult to keep up. But we’ve created a timeline to keep you in the loop on this high-profile controversy.

How OpenAI’s Board Setup Paved the Way for a Chaotic Situation 

Let’s go back to 2015 when OpenAI started to understand how things unfolded. Initially, OpenAI, operating as a non-profit, aimed to bring the benefits of artificial general intelligence to everyone.

However, the costs for computational power and talent needed for AI projects exceeded donations. In 2019, a solution emerged – OpenAI transitioned into a “capped profit” company, creating a for-profit subsidiary to secure the funds required for advancing AI models.

This subsidiary, governed by a non-profit board, aimed to ensure OpenAI’s commitment to building safe AI for everyone. The board included OpenAI employees (Altman, chair Greg Brockman, and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever) and external directors (Quora CEO Adam D’Angelo, robotics entrepreneur Tasha McCauley, and Helen Toner from Georgetown University).

The board, evenly split between OpenAI and external members, had a crucial duty to prioritize “humanity, not OpenAI investors.” They could remove the CEO if they felt the company was straying from this mission.

Read More: From Firing to Rehiring: A Timeline of Sam Altman’s OpenAI Ouster and Comeback 


What Prompted Sam Altman’s Dismissal as CEO? 

On a Friday afternoon in November, Altman was informed by Sutskever and three external board members that his role as CEO was terminated. Brockman, the remaining board member, retained his position as an OpenAI employee.

The board cited Altman’s lack of consistent communication candor and a loss of confidence in his leadership ability as reasons for the dismissal. Mira Murati, the chief technology officer, was appointed as interim CEO.

While the exact reasons remain unclear, reported strains in Altman’s relationship with Toner, concerns about OpenAI’s safety practices, and abrupt moves to commercialize models were noted. Altman’s involvement in external projects, including collaboration with Jony Ive on an AI device, was also speculated to contribute to the board’s decision.

The AI community’s split between optimists and those concerned about the pace of development, with Sutskever leaning towards caution, played a role in the decision-making process.


Altman’s Shift to Microsoft, Shear Takes Over at OpenAI 

Despite investors, including Microsoft with a 49 percent stake, expressing a desire to reinstate Altman as OpenAI’s CEO, discussions reached an impasse. Twitch co-founder Emmett Shear swiftly stepped in as OpenAI’s interim CEO, aligning his AI development views more closely with the board’s preference for a 10 to 20 percent slowdown.¹

Surprisingly, Shear emphasized that Altman’s removal was unrelated to safety concerns. Simultaneously, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella announced that Altman, Brockman, and other OpenAI personnel would join Microsoft to lead a new “advanced AI research team.”


Reactions to Altman’s Dismissal? 

Altman’s removal from OpenAI stirred concern among employees, with the board’s vague explanation causing unrest. Brockman promptly resigned in protest, triggering reports of several staff members leaving in solidarity. Murati, the chief operating officer and the strategy officer echoed support for Altman and Brockman, emphasizing, “OpenAI is nothing without its people.”

Sutskever, initially part of the decision, later expressed regret and clarified he didn’t intend harm, joining over 500 employees in endorsing an open letter demanding the board’s resignation. Almost all 770 employees had added their names to the letter by day’s end. Microsoft invited signatories to join Altman’s new subsidiary if they chose to leave.


Altman Returns and Board Restructures at OpenAI 

Under increasing pressure, with staff and Sutskever reversing decisions, Altman’s return as CEO became inevitable. On November 21, an “agreement in principle” was reached, marking Altman’s comeback and a board restructuring. Brockman also resumed his position.²

Shear, interim CEO for three days, expressed satisfaction with the resolution. He committed to an independent investigation into Altman’s dismissal and was ready to resign without a thorough explanation.

Changes at the board level include Bret Taylor as the new chair and Larry Summers as an appointee. D’Angelo is the sole original board member. Nadella aims to stay informed given Microsoft’s investment, possibly leading to a Microsoft representative joining the board.

While the recent drama might appear settled, ongoing developments and their impact on artificial general intelligence advancement are expected to unfold.


Takeaways from the Sam Altman Story 

The recent twists in Sam Altman’s career show the critical problems that can happen when one key person is crucial to a company. His leaving as CEO of OpenAI, a plea from over 500 employees for him to come back, his move to Microsoft, and then his return to OpenAI highlight the risks and issues when a company depends too much on just one influential figure.


1. Visionary Leadership Risks and Riches

In visionary leadership, like that seen with figures such as Sam Altman, risks come into play. One risk is relying too much on one influential leader, making the organization vulnerable if that leader leaves.

It’s essential to share leadership responsibilities, promoting collaboration and strategic distribution of tasks. For staffing firms, the lesson is building a shared leadership culture for stability, even if critical individuals depart.

On the flip side, visionary leadership offers significant benefits. Thought leaders can foster creativity, and fractional CMOs can tap into untapped marketing avenues. For staffing firms, this means identifying and capitalizing on the overlooked potential within their organization and the broader industry.


2. Balancing Key Dependence on Individuals

Thought leaders and top performers at staffing firms have specialized knowledge and established client relationships. However, over-reliance on just a few rainmakers creates business continuity risks. Firms can mitigate this by identifying upcoming stars, facilitating teamwork, and capturing institutional knowledge.


3. Creating a Balanced Leadership Environment

Instead of concentrating authority, organizations should cultivate a pipeline of leadership talent. Encourage high performers to coach and mentor others. Foster an open culture where employees collaborate, and decisions involve diverse viewpoints. This spreads capabilities firm-wide for stability and shared progress.

Read More: Swift Success: Leadership Lessons from Taylor Swift’s Journey 


4. Employee Loyalty Has Its Limits

Despite OpenAI’s prestigious reputation, most employees were willing to exit in solidarity with ousted leaders. Bottom line? Organizations can’t take staff loyalty for granted.

It’s crucial to foster open communication to address concerns and avoid surprises. Keep employees informed about organizational decisions, ensuring they feel valued and involved in the decision-making process.

But it’s not just limited to that; throw some fantastic reward programs and shout-outs to build a killer work vibe. It’s not just about the job – show them some love, and watch that loyalty and engagement shoot through the roof!


5. Commercial Pressures Strain Ideals

OpenAI’s shift from a non-profit to a for-profit model created tensions between monetization and safety priorities. Mission-driven organizations should proactively address such pressure points. How do you navigate the money game?

Clearly define and communicate the organization’s mission to align with its values. Ensure everyone is on the same page regarding priorities, even in the face of commercial pressures. Most of all, stick a solid ethical compass in the ground. When the money winds blow, use it to stay on course and not lose sight of what matters.

Read More: Would JUUL Look At That: A Deep Dive into Defining Your Audience, Social Media, and Ethical Marketing 


6. Personal Dynamics Influence Organizations

Interpersonal friction between leaders reportedly played a role in Altman’s abrupt removal. The consequences reveal how individual relationships can significantly impact organizations, for better or worse.

So, keep the interpersonal vibes positive. Encourage team-building activities and open communication to dodge those unnecessary office showdowns. And leaders, be mindful of your relationships. A little camaraderie goes a long way, but watch for those stormy clouds brewing. Personal dynamics can either make or break the team spirit!

Related Reading: Leadership Lessons from F1’s Dominant Force: Insights from Mercedes Team Principal Toto Wolff 



Empower your organization with a resilient leadership model that values collaboration and diverse contributions. At Allied Insight, we bring a blend of highly effective marketing strategies and thought leadership content customized to navigate today’s candidate market complexities.

Contact us today and transform your organization’s future with us.



1 Forsdick, Sam. “Turmoil at OpenAI and Three Challenges for Its New CEO.” Raconteur, 21 Nov. 2023,

2 Heath, Alex. “Sam Altman to Return as CEO of OpenAI.” The Verge, 22 Nov. 2023,



Revolutionize Your Marketing with These 6 Graphic Design Tools in 2024

Gemini Advance: Is it a Marketing Miracle or Just Hype?

Beyond the Pound Sign: 7 Best Hashtag Tools